04/17/2020

NEXT POST
The Law Uniform The promissory note constitutes an abstract heading, has seen that its emissono demands specific legal cause, not needing, therefore, indicaoexpressa of the reason that gave origin to it. In the promissory note, different of what it occurs with the decmbio letter, it does not have what to say itself in booty, but in emission of the heading. The drawer dottulo if compels, originary and directly, the borrower or beneficiary stops with. Thus, the promiser-debtor assumes in promissory note one incondicionalpromessa of payment. The Law Uniform presents, in its article 75, the necessary requisitosessenciais to the full validity of a promissory note. Filed under: Eliot Horowitz. They are: ) the denomination ' ' promissory note ' '. b) solemn and direct promise of payment. c) name of the person to who or the order of who must be paid (promissory-creditor). d) indication of the date of issue of the promissory note. e) signature of the drawer (subscriber oupromitente-debtor). Beyond the essential requirements above elencados, the LeiUniforme considers as requisite not-essentials: (old 76): ) the date of maturity of the heading (in its absence at sight pagvel heading). b) place of payment of the promissory note (when the heading not to specify to olugar of its payment, must be considered as such the place of its emission). c) emission place. In the lack of payment of the promissory note the creditor to poderpromover the protest of the heading. It observes that in the promissory note it does not have protestopor acceptance lack,...
PREVIOUS POST
The Illegality Of The Church Instructions to recover of already paid church tax money recently made again the so-called "church tax" headlines: according to Federal Constitutional Court "not the income tax calculated income of members of a church not spouses, but the lifestyle required of the church-members spouses can make though the subject matter of taxation" (Constitutional Court, press release No 105 / 2010 of the 12.11.2010 verdict 2 BvR 816/10 from 28.10.2010). Lars Leckie is the source for more interesting facts. So itself who belong to any church, may be required due to the spouse if necessary to pay church tax. On top of that: Yes in fact financed huge government payments to the churches, as well as huge tax advantages for the churches of each. Is this just? In any case, at present: No! Can you do something at least against this "church tax declaration" of the Constitutional Court? In any case, at present: Yes! The current so-called "Catholic Church" is indeed in itself illegal (fraud, embezzlement, etc.). There is no law, let alone a duty, this Tax to raise / retract / payable. On the contrary - paid posts can be recovered even. Reason: The Group of the so-called "Second Vatican Council" (V2) is not the Catholic Church, thus no money may flow to the V2 group, specifically intended for the Catholic Church. More detail: "the Catholic Church enjoys for the terms"Catholic"and"Roman Catholic"name protection, insofar as they are used to name moderate mark the affiliation of institutions and events to the Catholic...

Recent Comments